Was america justified in dropping the atomic bomb essay

Why make two kinds? That was an American strategy to keep superiority over the Soviet Union after the war, because Americans knew that Japan would surrender soon anyway, so they wanted to experiment to see which type of bomb would be more effective. I think that's evident, in that Truman told Churchill about the bomb but not Stalin.

Face To Face: Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb On Japan Justified?

It was an experiment to see which bomb America should rely on, uranium or plutonium. Therefore there was no need to drop the bomb on cities, because it was an experiment. I think the argument that the bomb was necessary to save lives came afterward, and the real reason was the American nuclear strategy against the Soviet Union. In addition, in June when Americans chose the cities for atomic bombing, they were Kyoto, Hiroshima and Kokura.

Then Kyoto was removed and Nagasaki was added. At the time, the American Government banned attack by conventional bombs on those cities. If you want to measure the effect of a new bomb, it's stupid to drop it on cities that are already destroyed.

So I think they wanted to measure the power of destruction, and see what the damage to humans would be. So it appears to have been an experiment. Look, I don't want to make a comparison between the number of deaths from an atomic bomb and an invasion, but as long you raise it, I'll discuss it.

Even U. There's no basis for talking about a million lives being saved.

Thank you for registering to HistoryExtra

In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on the other hand, , lives were lost. And radiation continues to damage the human body. The figure of several tens of thousands of dead in an invasion, that's dead Americans.

And in the war the ratio of dead Japanese to dead Americans was sometimes more than 20 to 1. So if 40, Americans had died, that would have been more than , Japanese dead.

Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified? Essay

And since more than , people died in Okinawa alone, isn't it reasonable to think that many times that number would have died in a fight for the Japan home islands? There is a possibility that could have happened, but it's just a guess. We can't say what numbers are right. Now, it's true that the army wanted to fight to the end.

Site Information Navigation

But there were many people in the peace faction, like Foreign Minister Togo and the Emperor himself. If Americans really had wanted to end the war early, they could have given the peace faction information about effects of the atomic bomb, or about the prospective damage from an invasion.

But the U. I think that's clear from all kinds of documents. That's why the Americans never said they would allow the emperor system to continue, and that's why they didn't give information about the effects of the atomic bomb to the peace faction. This war was killing many soldiers and Japan was not backing down.


  • essay on importance of education in todays life?
  • critical thinking model.
  • The Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  • sc state superintendent of education essay contest?

President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb when things were getting worse. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a difficult one and many people wonder if it was the right …show more content…. They slaughtered thousands of Chinese civilians during the rape of Nanking in It was necessary for America to drop the bomb. Henry L.

Stimson was a secretary of war under both Presidents Roosevelt and Truman. He believed that as long as the Japanese government refused to surrender then the U. The atomic bomb allowed the U. War is brutal. It is destructive and unforgiving no matter what the means, killing lives is killing lives. Using the atomic bomb, the United States was able to end the war quickly and with minimal lost American lives. Before the United States dropped the bomb, they allowed Japan a chance to surrender.

On July 26, , the allies issued the Potsdam Declaration. This treaty was meant to make Japan surrender without a war. This was a warning that Japan will undergo harsh and utter destruction if they refused the declaration.

WW2: Was it right to bomb Hiroshima? - BBC Teach

When the Japanese choose not to surrender President Truman makes the decision to use the atomic bomb rather than risk the 1,, projected lives lost in a man to man combat war. Hiroshima was a chosen as. Show More. Read More. Virginia tech dissertations. Barn burning short story text. Home Sitemap. Case studies medical negligence claims Photography coursework books Respiration of yeast coursework Rs coursework help The Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki Problems with The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay example on america's decision to drop the atomic bomb on japan.